Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0351219940260010057
Korean Journal of Infectious Diseases
1994 Volume.26 No. 1 p.57 ~ p.63
In Vitro Activities of Teicoplanin and Vancomycin Against Gram Positive Cocci
ÃÖÅ¿­
ÀÌ¿õ¼ö/±è´ö¾ð/±èÈ«¼®/À¯Áø¿ì/¼­ÀÏÇý/±èÁ¤¿í/±è°æ¼÷/ÃÖÈ¿¼±
Abstract
An increasing frequency of methicillin resistant S. aureus(MRSA), methicillin resistant coagulase negative staphylococci(MRCNS) and Enterococcal infection have been observed in recent years. Teicoplanin is a new glycopeptide antibiotic obstained
from
the Actinoplanes teicomycetius. The molecular structure and spectrum of antimicrobial activity of teicoplanin is simillar to those of vancomycin, and has been reported to have an excellent in vitro and in vivo effect against various gram-positive
infections.
Therefore, we evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of gram positive cocci, such as, S. aureus, coagulase negative Staphylococci(CNS), and Enterococci to teicoplanin and vancomycin.
The total 253 strains consisted of MSSA(40), MRSA(53), MSCNS(47), MRCNS(48), and Enterococci(65). They were assayed by disc diffusion and agar dilution. During the study, 57% of S. aureus and 49% of CNS showed resistance to methicillin.
The inhibitory diameter of teicoplanin was 15-20mm in MSSA, 12-19mm in MRSA, 13-24mm in MSCNS, 11-23mm in MRCNS, and 15-22mm in Enterococci respectively, and showed sensitivity in all but 8 strains(3.2%). The range of the minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) of teicoplanin to MSSA, MRSA, MSCNS, MRCNS and Enterococci were 9.12-2.0§¶/ml 0.25-2.0§¶/ml, & 0.25-32§¶/ml, 0.12-1.0§¶/ml respectively. One case of S. haemolyticus was resistant to teicoplanin (32§¶/ml) by the agar dilution
method.
Eight minor (3.2%) and one major(0.4%) error was observed when the MIC and disk diffusion data were correlated with teicoplanin.
As for vancomycin the inhibitory diameter was 17-21mm in MSSA, 15-21mm in MRSA, 18-26mm in MSCNS, 18-25mm in MRCNS, and 16-24mm in Enterococci respectively. The range of the MIC of vancomycin to MSSA, MRSA, MSCNS, MRCNS, and Enterococci were
0.25-1.0§¶/ml, 0.25-4.0§¶/ml, 0.5-2.0§¶/ml and 0.5-2.0§¶/ml respectively. One minor error (0.4%) was seen with the vancomycin disk.
The MIC90 of MSSA and MRSA exhibited the same results in teicoplanin (1.0§¶/ml, 1.0§¶/ml), and vancomycin(2.0§¶/ml, 2.0§¶/ml). MRCNS exhibited greater MIC90 with teicoplanin(4.0§¶/ml, 8.0§¶/ml) than vancomycin(2.0§¶/ml, 2.0§¶/ml). In contrast
Enterococci were more susceptible to teicoplanin(0.5§¶/ml) than to vancomucin (2.0§¶/ml). Results from this analysis indicated that both teicoplanin and vancomycin were very excellent for gram positive inrections, especially those resistant to
methicillin
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø